Skip to content

A little note on the IMF

June 6, 2011

Before Tory commentators are enraptured with hysterical joy at the ringing endorsement of their fiscal policies as “appropriate” and “adequate” by the IMF, a few things should be borne in mind.

A credit to the IMF

1. The IMF is a body with a very specific agenda. It was best described by former VP of the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz, to Johann Hari: “When the IMF arrives in a country, they are interested in only one thing. How do we make sure the banks and financial institutions are paid?… It is the IMF that keeps the [financial] speculators in business. They’re not interested in development, or what helps a country to get out of poverty.” I would urge you to read Hari’s article in full: It’s not just Dominique Strauss-Kahn. The IMF itself should be on trial. It is also worth noting that the IMF is bound under the rules of Article IV consultations to “respect the domestic social and political policies of members” when consulting (Section3b).

2. Argentina, which had been the busty centrefold of IMF policies throughout the 1990’s by sticking religiously to all IMF advice – privatising everything but their anthem, liberalising industries, lowering corporation taxes while tightening public spending – suffered one of the most catastrophic economic collapses in 2001. I would encourage you to watch the Fernando Solanas’ 2003 excellent documentary “Memoria del Saqueo“, if you wish to know more.

3. Last year, Hungary told the IMF to take its recommendations and shove them where the Strauss-Kahn don’t shine. The IMF insisted on tougher austerity measures, Hungary wanted to tax its banks and the rich. Talks between Hungary and the IMF collapsed and the IMF warned that Hungary would be punished for its folly. The Centre for Economic and Policy Research warned that the IMF’s obsession with austerity was dangerous. A year on, the IMF had to eat its words and commend Hungary for its ongoing recovery, which is going very well – thank you.

4. Finally, it is most crucial to note what the IMF had to say on the UK economy in 2007, the performance of which it described as “impressive”. They said: “The financial sector is strong and well supervised with a principle-based approach. The fiscal framework is good, and the mission focused on how to build fiscal cushions needed to respond to adverse shocks. In particular, looking ahead to the framework over future cycles, we noted that debt is likely to rise to just under 40 percent of GDP over the next few years. This in itself is not a concern, and it still constitutes one of the lowest debt ratios among G-7 countries”. This was the year before the whole fecking thing collapsed on our heads.

In conclusion, one ought to approach any fiscal advice by the IMF like a chambermaid might approach the hotel room of its former head: with extreme caution.

Next week: Harold Shipman endorses the government’s policy on the NHS.

10 Comments leave one →
  1. Enfrance permalink
    June 6, 2011 3:49 pm

    So often blog comments of this sort have little to commend them because they are the uninformed view of the individual blogger.

    Its so good to see a blogger give links and references to enhance the argument.

    Well done, as usual.

  2. June 6, 2011 4:06 pm

    Dr Shipman for Health Minister and Ronald Biggs for Chancellor.
    Great article, and for the last line made me laugh so thanks for that.

  3. June 7, 2011 9:58 am

    Here at the tip of the bonfire of the quangos, I’ll loose my job the same day as some of our ‘regional’ (i.e. Not Whitehall; the place location is immaterial) strategists. So much for ‘localising’ the economy IMF big-brains.

  4. June 7, 2011 10:41 am

    I once met T Dan Smith in a pub in North Shields. I asked him about paying huge rents on empty office blocks. He talked a bit about it, a very loud speaker Mr. Smith. Then he said that if everyone who should have, had gone to prison, there would have been a huge building boom. Then he paused and gave a very thoughtful look to everyone. Then exploded in laughter. We all did, as it was obvious he had thought of the inmates of said jails, owning them and charging the taxpayer a fortune for putting them in there.

  5. June 7, 2011 11:22 am

    Good point on the Hungary comparison. While the Baltic states generally sacrificed their national income to join the euro–with a a programme that might as well have been designed by the IMF.

    The results were awful:

    Or take Ireland and Greece, which have continued to contract.

    Meanwhile, Hungary is growing nicely.

  6. June 7, 2011 7:01 pm

    DSK had a long history of sexual improprieties. People like this fellow should be held accountable for his acctions. The IMF should be held acocuntable for covering up his sexual agression.

  7. June 15, 2011 4:49 pm

    Telling it like it is.

Trackbacks

  1. » Tax Research UK
  2. A little note about the IMF – to be read very soon after you hear George Osborne on the same subject | called2account
  3. A little note on the IMF « mySatelite

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,483 other followers

%d bloggers like this: