Skip to content

Nigel Farage: The Media’s Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

December 28, 2014
20141228-200303.jpg

The Times responded to criticism with this tweet, later deleted.

“I think Farage is certainly a xenophobe”, declared Danny Finklestein, Executive Editor of The Times, “he is however a game changing politician. I don’t defend him, I find his influence depressing but it’s clearly there.”

This has echoed several embarrassed Times employees’ defence of the decision to name Nigel Farage “Briton of The Year”. It is observation, they claim, reflection. It is not endorsement. This is misleading in two ways.

First, The Times is well aware of its brand and how it can be used. The editorial explaining the decision is nuanced (actually apologetic might be a more accurate description, as if somehow the edict came from higher up and they were left to rationalise it ex post facto). But only a fraction of the public will read it behind their paywall. What most people will take away is the title “The Times Briton of The Year”.

It sounds unequivocally like an accolade and all the nuanced editorials in the world cannot make it sound like observation or reflection. It also plays directly into a nationalist agenda. Nigel Farage understands this. “Despite all,” he crowed on twitter, “The Times has named me Briton of the year. Attacks aside, I am grateful. Thank you.” Despite all, attacks aside, even an institution as august as The Times had to hand it to him.

So, no, Danny. Only the most clueless schoolboy would claim to be unaware of the halo effect of plastering your publication’s name and the words “Briton of The Year” next to the name of someone you acknowledge as a xenophobe. And then have the nerve to tweet #hatersgonnahate to people criticising you.

Second, and more important, I despise the utter denial of responsibility their rationale entails. Nigel Farage was made influential by print and TV media which for far too long viewed him as (a) an easy way to sell papers/boost viewing figures; (b) a cheap way to add frisson to dull political analysis by complacent commentators who dare not ask difficult questions; and (c) a way to blackmail the Tory party into Euroscepticism.

Farage did not become magically influential by a wave of the Influence Fairy’s wand. You created him, you sensationalised him and, with this award, you continue to do so. It is the equivalent of the BBC anointing him “Television Personality of the Year” on the strength of his many Question Time and Daily Politics appearances – the BBC’s doing in the first place. For years TV, radio and print aggrandised him beyond what any reasonable person thought he merited, only to then eventually turn around and say: “See? We told you he was influential.”

Nigel Farage is the media’s self-fulfilling prophecy.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. December 28, 2014 8:10 pm

    Reblogged this on sdbast.

  2. mike hamblett permalink
    December 28, 2014 10:17 pm

    All these bored journos, hacks, Finks and producers can’t be arsed to report news now. They make news and are an insidious danger to all of us. Be careful what you wish for, there are no jobs for life now.

  3. December 29, 2014 8:19 am

    Farage didn’t win a national election with media hype. UKIP is a 40k membership political party with local branches across UK campaigning locally.

    The media has tried to undermine it with smears and negative op-eds. Not least those in the Times.

    UKIP is not a media bubble. It is an idea whose time has come.

  4. Pam Smith permalink
    December 30, 2014 3:29 pm

    This ‘Ukip won a national election’ claim is inaccurate. The election was to the European Parliament so it was pan-national. No power accrues to the party which gets the most candidates elected unless they team up with others in the parliament – which is a bit of a problem for Ukip since then we see who they consider to be acceptable allies.

    Have to say I’ve had quite a lot of entertainment since the relatives went home seeing Times journalists conducting conversations on Twitter about how the rest of us who don’t choose to go behind their paywall are missing the point. It underlines the fact that Murdoch really doesn’t understand the interface between news organisations and social media. If you have to spend your Christmas holidays attempting to spin your own story back under control on Twitter and berating people for not falling for the clickbait aspect of the story, it’s got to be one massive fail.

    To say nothing of M. Farage thanking the Times for the accolade they say they haven’t given him ….😀

  5. January 6, 2015 12:09 pm

    While I agree with the essential point you make, you must surely recognise the irony of blogging about someone inherently undeserving of any media attention; aren’t you just adding to the muck slick?

    • mike permalink
      January 6, 2015 3:59 pm

      Fink is merely distracting attention away from Gaza, paedos, and other establishment shames and cronyism. He is not his own man.

Trackbacks

  1. » Worth Reading 150: Out of psalms ¦ What You Can Get Away With

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: